
Allegory of Wealth
Simon Vouet·1640
Historical Context
Allegory of Wealth, painted around 1640 and held at the Louvre, is one of Vouet's most celebrated allegorical canvases and a key example of the decorative history painting that defined French court taste during Louis XIII's reign. The allegorical figure of Wealth — Richesse or Fortuna — was a subject with deep roots in the humanist tradition, and Vouet's interpretation, showing a sumptuous female personification surrounded by coins, jewels, and other emblems of material abundance, served both as decorative embellishment and as a meditation on the nature and ambiguity of worldly prosperity. The painting's original context was likely a royal or aristocratic interior — possibly the Palais Royal, the Château de Rueil, or another major decorative programme that Vouet executed for the court — where Wealth might have appeared alongside companion allegories of the other virtues or forces governing human life. The Louvre's holding of this work as a signature piece places it among the permanent touchstones for evaluating Vouet's mature French style.
Technical Analysis
Vouet deploys his full palette range in this allegory: the figure's flesh tones glow against the metallic glitter of coins and jewels, and the drapery is handled with the fluid, rhythmic elegance characteristic of his Parisian period. The compositional arrangement foregrounds the symbolic objects while placing the personification above and behind them, asserting the figure's dominance over the material wealth she represents.
Look Closer
- ◆Coins, jewels, and precious objects are rendered with detailed attention to their reflective surfaces, demonstrating Vouet's technical range beyond figure painting
- ◆The allegorical figure's pose — commanding, slightly elevated — establishes her as sovereign over wealth rather than merely its embodiment
- ◆The richness of the colour palette itself — saturated reds, golds, and blues — mirrors the subject matter in the most direct visual way possible
- ◆Subsidiary figures or putti, if present, would reinforce the allegory's meaning through their own symbolic attributes and actions






