
Saint John in the Desert
Domenico Veneziano·c. 1445/1450
Historical Context
Domenico Veneziano's Saint John in the Desert from around 1445-50 is a panel from the predella of the Sant'Egidio Altarpiece, one of the most important and most completely lost major paintings of the Florentine Renaissance — only the predella panels survive. Veneziano was among the most important painters of the generation between Masaccio and Piero della Francesca, and his contribution to Florentine painting — particularly his handling of outdoor light, which Piero absorbed and developed — was fundamental to the Renaissance synthesis. This tiny panel, showing the young John undressing to assume his camel-hair garment before his withdrawal to the desert, is remarkable for its spatial clarity, its luminous outdoor light, and its sense of the landscape as a specific place rather than a generic backdrop. It demonstrates why Veneziano's lost frescoes were mourned by subsequent generations.
Technical Analysis
The tempera on panel demonstrates Veneziano's innovative approach to light and landscape, with clear, luminous colors and a bright, airy atmosphere unprecedented in Florentine painting. The stark, rocky desert setting is rendered with a geometric clarity that anticipates Piero della Francesca's spatial vision.
Provenance
Main altar of the church of Santa Lucia de' Magnoli, Florence, probably until the early 18th century.[1] Sacristy of the same church, by 1728.[2] Third altar on the right of the nave of the same church, by 1762 and probably until the early 1800s.[3] Bernard Berenson [1865-1959], Settignano, acquired, perhaps in London, by July 1913;[4] presented 1919 by his wife, Mary Berenson, to Carl W. Hamilton [1886-1967], New York;[5] sold 1942 to the Samuel H. Kress Foundation, New York;[6] gift 1943 to NGA. [1] The altarpiece is cited as being on the main altar (erroneously, as a work of Andrea del Castagno) by Giovanni Cinelli in Francesco Bocchi, _Le bellezze della città di Firenze_, ed. Giovanni Cinelli, Florence, 1677 (originally 1591): 280. It was probably moved on the occasion of restoration work done in the church between 1712 and 1715 (see Walter and Elisabeth Paatz, _Die Kirchen von Florenz_, 6 vols., Frankfurt am Main, 1941: 2:607). [2] Cited as being there by Filippo Baldinucci, _Notizie dei professori del disegno da Cimbaue in qua_, 5 vols. (originally 6 vols.), ed. F. Ranalli, Florence, 1845-1847 (originally 1728): 3:95 n. 1. [3] The altarpiece was described there by both Giuseppe Richa, _Notizie istoriche delle chiese florentine_, 10 vols., Florence, 1754-1762: 10:294) and Vincenzo Follini and Modesto Rastrelli, _Firenze antica e moderna_, 8 vols., Florence, 1789-1802: 8:254). Among early writers, G. Lanzi (_Storia pittorica della Italia_, Bassano, 1795-1796: 1:58) is the only one who mentions the predella, which at that time must still have been attached to the main panel. That in 1827 the usually careful Rumohr, the first to read and transcribe the signature of Domenico Veneziano on the altarpiece, did not mention the predella, leads one to suppose that by this date it was no longer in the church. See Carl Friedrich von Rumohr, _Italienische Forschungen_, 3 vols., ed. by Julius Schlosser, Frankfurt am Main, 1920 (originally Berlin, 1827-1831): 387. In fact, Rumohr presumably saw the panel during his second stay in Italy, between 1816 and 1820. (See E. Sigismund, "R.C.F. Freiherr von Rumohr," in _Allgemeines Lexikon der bildenden Künstler von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart_, ed. Ulrich Thieme, Felix Becker, and Hans Vollmer, 37 vols., Liepzig, 1907-1950: 29[1935]:202.) [4] According to his own statements (see Bernard Berenson, _Abbozzo per un autoritratto_, Florence, 1949: 228-229), Berenson collected art works only for the furnishing and decoration of his house, and ceased purchasing toward the middle of the second decade of the twentieth century. The period in which he came into possession of NGA 1943.4.48 can therefore be placed between about 1900 (when he moved to Villa I Tatti near Florence) and about 1915. The 1913 date was supplied by Carl Strehlke (curator, Philadelphia Museum of Art; e-mail to David Brown, 7 April 2011, in NGA curatorial files), who kindly shared his research in Berenson records at I Tatti. In the files of temporary import licenses for which Berenson applied are both a receipt dated 24 July 1913, on printed stationary of A.L. Nicholson in London, for "Picture on Panel / 'A Saint in the Wilderness' School of Fra Angelico," and Berenson's declaration to the Soprintendenza that he brought from London: "Dipinto su tavola con cornice Fig. S. Giovannino nel deserto." Both these documents probably refer to the NGA painting. [5] See Nicky Mariano and Kenneth Clark, _Forty Years with Berenson_, New York, 1966: 18, who claim that it was Mary Berenson who gave the present, and the rectification by David Alan Brown, "Berenson's Contribution to Scholarship, Taste, and Collecting," in _Berenson and the Connoisseurship of Italian Painting_, exh. cat., National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C., 1979: 22-23. [6] Fern Rusk Shapley, _Catalogue of the Italian Paintings_, 2 vols., Washington, D.C., 1979: 1:159-162. Hamilton offered his painting to Samuel H. Kress in a letter dated May 1942 (copy in NGA curatorial files); the offer was accepted in the same year. See also The Kress Collection Digital Archive, https://kress.nga.gov/Detail/objects/1856.
%2C_washington.jpg&width=600)


_-_The_Adoration_of_the_Kings_-_95A_-_Gem%C3%A4ldegalerie.jpg&width=600)



